sexgenderbody

There is no "should"

81 notes &

cocksucking-accent:

jtoday:

This is interesting, and explains a LOT about why some peoples’ versions of polyamory just rubs me the wrong way. (A lot of my issues in this post could be explained by this chart)
The biggest problems I see in polyamorous relationships boil down to two things:
1. “I’m want two girlfriends / I want to be in a triad / I want a harem / We’re looking for a cute bisexual girl” - Looking for a relationship type (a fantasy) instead of a person
It’s good to know what you want in a relationship, and to know what you’d be open to. But you shouldn’t “look for two girlfriends.” You should look for people AS PEOPLE. You should find someone who shares your interests, your perspective on life, who you get along with. You should be upfront with them that you are a polyamorous person, but you shouldn’t look to COLLECT LOVERS like their value lies in how they can fulfill your romantic/sexual fantasies. You should look for people, and if you happen to be lucky enough to find two or three or five or ten people who you can connect with on an intimate level, then that is amazing. I feel like you should go into it with an attitude of humility and gratitude. 
2. “We have veto power” / “She can be with women but only one man” / “Sleep with whoever you want but don’t fall in love” / “Date casually but don’t have sex” - Rules instead of working through your issues of inadequacy and jealousy
It’s good to set boundaries and understand what each person in comfortable with in a relationship. But a lot of the “boundaries” I see people setting are unfair, not possible to predict (you can’t stop falling in love with someone), or are really there because one or both partners are jealous and don’t want to deal with it. That’s not really polyamory, to me. That’s two (possibly actually monogamous) people who maybe like the idea of polyamory but who aren’t ready to deal with it what it really means. 
Both of these sort of tie into each other. A lot of the problems in two could also be less from jealousy/inadequacy and more from the same as #1 - viewing people as something you use to fulfill your fantasies instead of as people you care about and love. Or both - you may be so blinded by your own inadequacy and jealousy that you can’t understand what the other person means to your partner. I can’t see anyone saying “we have veto power because our relationship always comes first” unless they don’t respect the person they’re seeing as an individual worthy of love and respect. You would never “veto” someone’s relationship unless their usefulness to fulfill your own selfish fantasies was no longer worth the cost it takes to be in a relationship with them.
Suppose that’s my spontaneous opinion on the subject. I don’t know why I’m so full of opinions recently.

More reblogging of this girl.

cocksucking-accent:

jtoday:

This is interesting, and explains a LOT about why some peoples’ versions of polyamory just rubs me the wrong way. (A lot of my issues in this post could be explained by this chart)

The biggest problems I see in polyamorous relationships boil down to two things:

1. “I’m want two girlfriends / I want to be in a triad / I want a harem / We’re looking for a cute bisexual girl” - Looking for a relationship type (a fantasy) instead of a person

It’s good to know what you want in a relationship, and to know what you’d be open to. But you shouldn’t “look for two girlfriends.” You should look for people AS PEOPLE. You should find someone who shares your interests, your perspective on life, who you get along with. You should be upfront with them that you are a polyamorous person, but you shouldn’t look to COLLECT LOVERS like their value lies in how they can fulfill your romantic/sexual fantasies. You should look for people, and if you happen to be lucky enough to find two or three or five or ten people who you can connect with on an intimate level, then that is amazing. I feel like you should go into it with an attitude of humility and gratitude. 

2. “We have veto power” / “She can be with women but only one man” / “Sleep with whoever you want but don’t fall in love” / “Date casually but don’t have sex” - Rules instead of working through your issues of inadequacy and jealousy

It’s good to set boundaries and understand what each person in comfortable with in a relationship. But a lot of the “boundaries” I see people setting are unfair, not possible to predict (you can’t stop falling in love with someone), or are really there because one or both partners are jealous and don’t want to deal with it. That’s not really polyamory, to me. That’s two (possibly actually monogamous) people who maybe like the idea of polyamory but who aren’t ready to deal with it what it really means. 

Both of these sort of tie into each other. A lot of the problems in two could also be less from jealousy/inadequacy and more from the same as #1 - viewing people as something you use to fulfill your fantasies instead of as people you care about and love. Or both - you may be so blinded by your own inadequacy and jealousy that you can’t understand what the other person means to your partner. I can’t see anyone saying “we have veto power because our relationship always comes first” unless they don’t respect the person they’re seeing as an individual worthy of love and respect. You would never “veto” someone’s relationship unless their usefulness to fulfill your own selfish fantasies was no longer worth the cost it takes to be in a relationship with them.

Suppose that’s my spontaneous opinion on the subject. I don’t know why I’m so full of opinions recently.

More reblogging of this girl.

(Source: taxidermyandlace)

Filed under Polyamory Relationships Privilege Advice Opinions jtoday

  1. ashleyisapoliticalguytoo reblogged this from merboi-swag
  2. confessionsofababypoly reblogged this from jtoday
  3. forgottendance reblogged this from cocksucking-accent
  4. totalgeek42 reblogged this from merboi-swag
  5. merboi-swag reblogged this from fairyhell
  6. fairyhell reblogged this from darkcloudtherainbowwarrior
  7. darkcloudtherainbowwarrior reblogged this from dinksdinksdinks
  8. thefeeloffree reblogged this from fumblingtowardshappiness
  9. pennysilvermoon reblogged this from taxidermyandlace
  10. sendforbromina reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  11. dancing-with-diversity reblogged this from cocksucking-accent
  12. wareq reblogged this from jtoday
  13. dinksdinksdinks reblogged this from notaskingforpermission
  14. fumblingtowardshappiness reblogged this from notaskingforpermission and added:
    Keeping this in mind and sending the post to someone who might need to read it.
  15. notaskingforpermission reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  16. loveisthewateroflife reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  17. cocksucking-accent reblogged this from quixoticlyqueer and added:
    Re-reblogging because I like KP’s comments. I particularly like
  18. heavymetalharlot reblogged this from jtoday and added:
    1. The chart has an example of “we’re looking for an attractive bisexual woman…” - my point is there’s absolutely...
  19. omgfabulous reblogged this from jackietorrance
  20. ibylis reblogged this from sexgenderbody and added:
    reblogging because people are still too weirded out by anything more than a girl and a guy in a relationship
  21. llamak93 reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  22. namelesschaos reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  23. quixoticlyqueer reblogged this from cocksucking-accent and added:
    I can appreciate some of this - particularly the commentary on harem collection and the over-emphasis on sexuality in...