Wednesday, May 1, 2013 Sunday, April 21, 2013 Sunday, March 31, 2013
Attraction is not just about a feeling. It’s a heavily mediated experience and part of an industry that pumps billions into creating images of what women should look like. It can be hard to decipher what you are attracted to versus what you have internalized as attractive. This goes for both how we see ourselves and how we see others, and it leaves a lot of room to fester for some really messed up ideology about size, race, and sexuality. White standards of beauty get conflated with romantic ideals and create Cinderella-esque ideas of what romantic femininity should look like, all serving to uphold a certain standard of beauty. This impacts our self-esteem, the kind of energy we put out there, the types of people that are drawn to us, and ultimately who we end up dating. Samhita Mukhopadhyay (via wretchedoftheearth)
Friday, January 4, 2013

Aces With Others - “It’s just a phase!”

nothingbutaces:

This isn’t an exclusively-asexual thing. Pretty much everybody who isn’t a heterosexual, cisgendered individual has heard this. Hell, pretty much everybody who isn’t a carbon copy of their surroundings has heard this. Girls with pink hair, guys who wanna try out Satanism, ladies who were born dudes, dudes who like other dudes, girls with nose piercings and guys who don’t eat meat.

No matter what, people who don’t understand your beliefs, interests and personal viewpoint are going to suggest that it’s ‘just a phase’.

Something even scarier is the fact that a lot of outside-the-norm individuals have started saying that about other outside-the-norm individuals. The ‘it’s just a phase’ argument isn’t just coming from the outside anymore, it’s coming from the inside, and that’s definitely gonna create some problems down the road.

Read More

Thursday, January 3, 2013
[I]magine what would happen if, instead of centering our beliefs about heterosexual sex around the idea that the man “penetrates” the woman, we were to say that the woman’s vagina “consumes” the man’s penis. This would create a very different set of connotations, as the woman would become the active initiator and the man would be the passive and receptive party. One can easily see how this could lead to men and masculinity being seen as dependent on, and existing for the benefit of, femaleness and femininity. Similarly, if we thought about the feminine traits of being verbally effusive and emotive not as signs of insecurity or dependence, but as bold acts of self-expression, then the masculine ideal of the “strong and silent” type might suddenly seem timid and insecure by comparison. Julia Serano, Whipping Girl: A Transsexual Woman on Sexism and the Scapegoating of Femininity (“Putting the Feminine Back into Feminism,” pg 329)

(Source: yakotta)

Friday, November 9, 2012 Thursday, October 4, 2012

noretreatxnosurrender:

I’m currently working on a paper about deaf sex education and how it differs from regular sex education (which already sucks) and why. Any info you’d like to share?

Friday, September 21, 2012 Thursday, September 20, 2012

Asexuality

medepressed:

I am asexual.

But I am married to a man who is not asexual.

And it is not a problem for us.

There can be realionships where another person is an asexual and the another’s not. Sex is not everything in a relationship. My husband has told me that a person doesn’t need to get everything they want. People need to learn to cope with disappointments. And actually, it’s not even disappointing, when you understand the fact that you can’t have it all.

We have a loving relationship. We sleep in the same bed, we kiss and cuddle, we tell each other “I love you” all the time. Our everyday life is really calm and full of love towards each other, the only thing we don’t have in our relationship is sex.

My husband is okay with the fact that he’s got a great relationship and a loving wife, but no sex. He doesn’t go out cheating on me, but I know he pleases himself in the shower sometimes. And that’s okay. That’s completely okay and normal for us. We are like any couple on the outside and what happens between us is something for us to decide.

I used to be really anxious about my asexuality. I tried to force myself into having sex. But my husband saw that I was not as happy as I could be when I was trying to be something I am not and he told me I don’t have to force myself into having sex with him. Nowadays we’re both okay with our relationship.

Only problem we have is that at some point, we want to have a child. And having a biological child means we have to have sex… Well, maybe I can do it once for the sake of having a child with my dear husband.

This is not a text about what others should do, just a text that tells how my life is. I just wanted to talk about my asexuality anonymously here in my blog and now it’s done.

Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Labels and categories do not define you, they describe you. They’re a shorthand for expressing the complexity of your identity to others and a springboard from which you can explore and understand yourself. If a label isn’t working for you then you don’t have to use it. If a group is telling you there’s only one true way to be your kind of person, you don’t have to listen to them! AVEN (via labyrinthinemusician)
Sunday, August 19, 2012 Friday, August 17, 2012
realheatherlynn:

I am a poly, in many senses of the word. I’m interested sexually in people of all sexes and genders and I’m also polyamorous. Currently I’m in a monogamous year long (and going strong) relationship with a cis-gendered man (i.e. he has male sex organs he was born with and he identifies as male). This relationship works because of two things: 1) he understands that my relationship with him does not invalidate my identified sexuality, and 2) we have a relationship based on “explicit monogamy”.
I created this term for myself two years ago when thinking about dating someone monogamously for the first time in six years or so. One of the (many) reasons I was so attracted to the concept of polyamory is because, for once, the rules go created up front and could change with the needs of my partners and myself. Monogamy didn’t offer me that - it was a strict set of rules no one talked about except in jokes or worry. So often in my teen and adult years I’ve talked to and consoled friends whose significant other had gone somewhere (a party or bar) without them and they were scared they had been cheated on. Monogamy, as I saw it (and with cheating statistics backing me up) was about jealousy, lack of trust, and cheating. And the “rules” for cheating weren’t defined. On TV if a girl was kissed by a guy without her consent and she didn’t kiss back, when she confessed it to her significant other it was cheating. Cuddling with someone while dating someone else got me looks and talking to’s. It was, in a word, confining. So I moved into polyamory with all it’s ups and downs because it was liberating. All of a sudden I was in a relationship defined solely by myself and the people I was involved with. I could be honest without being yelled at. And I could be slightly commitement phobic - a.k.a. myself.
And so, when the option to become monogamous with someone I really liked, I thought long and hard about it. Polyamory was something that defined me, that mattered to me, and it wasn’t going to be easy to give up. And so I told him that I wanted explicit monogamy - I wanted the rules laid out in front of me and discussed. I didn’t want to conform to something I hadn’t agreed to after having a 50/50 say say in my relationships. And with my current boyfriend that’s exactly what I have - a relationship where we’re both comfortable and ourselves, with rules we set for ourselves. It’s always honest and incredibly communicative, just like my open relationships.
Why bring this up in relation to the picture above? Because in Questionable Content I see characters who are myself and my friends. Dora is a bisexual who, in the entire span of the series, has never explored relationships with women, and I rarely have the chance to given the place I live. She has serious problems with relationships that cause her to be commitment phobic, and lately she’s been seeing a therapist. She acknowledges that things with her ex-boyfriend ended because of her and her insecurities, is trying to be friends with him, and ultimately I see a lot of myself in her. Tai, on the other hand, is an out and proud lesbian whom we’ve see hook up with a lot of women. She’s into friends with benefits, polyamory, and not defining what she’s doing by society’s rules or definitions. Ultimately I see a lot of myself in her, as well.
Why is this? Because we, as people, are complex, and I’m complex. I’ve had a lot of experiences, and a lot of figuring out what works for me. And the way the creator of Questionable Content has set it up is that Tai has a serious crush, and that she typically doesn’t feel like that, while Dora is trying to change her relationship ways as well, just like me. Just like a lot of people. And no, it probably won’t work out because most relationships don’t work out. But I also think that the creator has handled all his relationships well, from a lot of different walks from life, and the idea of having these two people (regardless of the fact that this is a lesbian relationship, and he’s talked about being worried about doing one because of the extra weight seeing lgbtq characters comes with) get together makes me happy because I’m seeing a LOT of myself in them. And the idea that polyamorous people can’t have a monogamous relationship, or that commitment problem people can’t have a more trusting, open relationship is insulting because it happens all the time, and even if it can’t work, well, these things don’t happen overnight. But I’m here to say that it can work through communication and trust. And really, I’m sick and tired of people acting like a lot of the relationship ideas discussed in QC can’t work or even exist in real life.
I’m not saying that was JesuOtaku’s intent, because I don’t think it was. I think she was just discussing a web comic from a fangirl perspective, but it set something off in me that made me feel like I needed to say something, so I did. And Jeph, if you see this, thank you for creating characters that match my life a lot better than anything else I’ve found.

realheatherlynn:

I am a poly, in many senses of the word. I’m interested sexually in people of all sexes and genders and I’m also polyamorous. Currently I’m in a monogamous year long (and going strong) relationship with a cis-gendered man (i.e. he has male sex organs he was born with and he identifies as male). This relationship works because of two things: 1) he understands that my relationship with him does not invalidate my identified sexuality, and 2) we have a relationship based on “explicit monogamy”.

I created this term for myself two years ago when thinking about dating someone monogamously for the first time in six years or so. One of the (many) reasons I was so attracted to the concept of polyamory is because, for once, the rules go created up front and could change with the needs of my partners and myself. Monogamy didn’t offer me that - it was a strict set of rules no one talked about except in jokes or worry. So often in my teen and adult years I’ve talked to and consoled friends whose significant other had gone somewhere (a party or bar) without them and they were scared they had been cheated on. Monogamy, as I saw it (and with cheating statistics backing me up) was about jealousy, lack of trust, and cheating. And the “rules” for cheating weren’t defined. On TV if a girl was kissed by a guy without her consent and she didn’t kiss back, when she confessed it to her significant other it was cheating. Cuddling with someone while dating someone else got me looks and talking to’s. It was, in a word, confining. So I moved into polyamory with all it’s ups and downs because it was liberating. All of a sudden I was in a relationship defined solely by myself and the people I was involved with. I could be honest without being yelled at. And I could be slightly commitement phobic - a.k.a. myself.

And so, when the option to become monogamous with someone I really liked, I thought long and hard about it. Polyamory was something that defined me, that mattered to me, and it wasn’t going to be easy to give up. And so I told him that I wanted explicit monogamy - I wanted the rules laid out in front of me and discussed. I didn’t want to conform to something I hadn’t agreed to after having a 50/50 say say in my relationships. And with my current boyfriend that’s exactly what I have - a relationship where we’re both comfortable and ourselves, with rules we set for ourselves. It’s always honest and incredibly communicative, just like my open relationships.

Why bring this up in relation to the picture above? Because in Questionable Content I see characters who are myself and my friends. Dora is a bisexual who, in the entire span of the series, has never explored relationships with women, and I rarely have the chance to given the place I live. She has serious problems with relationships that cause her to be commitment phobic, and lately she’s been seeing a therapist. She acknowledges that things with her ex-boyfriend ended because of her and her insecurities, is trying to be friends with him, and ultimately I see a lot of myself in her. Tai, on the other hand, is an out and proud lesbian whom we’ve see hook up with a lot of women. She’s into friends with benefits, polyamory, and not defining what she’s doing by society’s rules or definitions. Ultimately I see a lot of myself in her, as well.

Why is this? Because we, as people, are complex, and I’m complex. I’ve had a lot of experiences, and a lot of figuring out what works for me. And the way the creator of Questionable Content has set it up is that Tai has a serious crush, and that she typically doesn’t feel like that, while Dora is trying to change her relationship ways as well, just like me. Just like a lot of people. And no, it probably won’t work out because most relationships don’t work out. But I also think that the creator has handled all his relationships well, from a lot of different walks from life, and the idea of having these two people (regardless of the fact that this is a lesbian relationship, and he’s talked about being worried about doing one because of the extra weight seeing lgbtq characters comes with) get together makes me happy because I’m seeing a LOT of myself in them. And the idea that polyamorous people can’t have a monogamous relationship, or that commitment problem people can’t have a more trusting, open relationship is insulting because it happens all the time, and even if it can’t work, well, these things don’t happen overnight. But I’m here to say that it can work through communication and trust. And really, I’m sick and tired of people acting like a lot of the relationship ideas discussed in QC can’t work or even exist in real life.

I’m not saying that was JesuOtaku’s intent, because I don’t think it was. I think she was just discussing a web comic from a fangirl perspective, but it set something off in me that made me feel like I needed to say something, so I did. And Jeph, if you see this, thank you for creating characters that match my life a lot better than anything else I’ve found.